Skip to main content

The Age Pension Work Bonus Scheme and Periodic Work

Several recent queries have suggested we update our knowledge base on the Work Bonus Scheme (WBS).

The WBS provides a facility whereby the first $6,500 of age pensioners 'wages' is exempt from the income test. The WBS can apply to both you and your partner thereby providing a total of $13,000 of exemptions.

In a previous blog entry we discussed how a couple on the full pension was ‘earning’ more than $20,000 on top of the full pension. Each were employed on $6,500 pa and had a $250,000  bank account earning a deemed income less than the 'other' income threshold. This is because the WBS is in addition to the the income test threshold allowance of just over $7,000. So a total of more than $20,000 can be exempted from all classes of income test.

Now it should be noted the WBS only applies to only certain classes of employment - refer below.

What happens if the age pensioner does not earn a consistent wage - i.e. not a steady amount over the year - yet still earns less than the allowable $6,500 pa? Say working during school holidays.

The WBS has a ‘bank’ or balance that accumulates over time - to a maximum of $6,500.

If you earn less than $250 in a fortnight then your employment income will be assessed as $0 and the difference between what you earn and $250 will be added to your WBS balance. So if you earn $200 in a fortnight then $50 will be added to your WBS balance.

If you do not work then $250 will be added to your WBS balance.

If you earn $350 in a fortnight and have more than $100 in your WBS balance then you will be assessed as $0 employment income for that period.

Now let’s look at a more sporadic employment situation. Lets say you do not work for 10 fortnights and then earn $2,000 in a fortnight. You will have accumulated $2,500 in your WBS balance over the first 10 periods. So for the 11th period you will be assessed as having $0 employment income and your WBS balance will drop down to $750.

Then say you don’t work for 4 periods and then earn $4,000 in the fortnight. In the period of earning that $4,000 you will then have accumulated $2,000 in your WBS balance; so your income will be assessed as $2,000 and your pension will be reduced, and your WBS balance will be back to 0.

So in this situation your annual earnings may not be the full $6,500 pa yet you have not received your full entitlement.




NOTE: Centrelink states:

“The Work Bonus applies to income from employment, including wages paid in Australia and outside Australia.
The Work Bonus applies to income from employment, including:
  • wages paid in Australia and outside Australia
  • leave, where you remain an employee of the same employer and
  • director’s fees

We will apply the Work Bonus to your assessable employment income before your pension is paid each fortnight.
The Work Bonus is not applied to income from:

  • leave payments if you have terminated your employment
  • self-employed income
  • payments to you as a principal from sole traders or partnerships
  • investments or
  • superannuation income”

Comments

  1. In the case where a couple are individually getting paid part age pension-- where the husband earns $4,000 in the fortnight. In the period of earning that $4,000 the husband will then have accumulated $2,000 in his WBS balance; so his income will be assessed as $2,000 and your pension will be reduced, and your WBS balance will be back to 0. Will this affect the wife's age pension?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Where the husband's (who is on aged pension) wages exceeds $6500, say he earned $10,000 in wages and this affects his pension, will this also affect the wife's aged pension?

    ReplyDelete
  3. Thanks for posting this info. I just want to let you know that I just check out your site and I find it very interesting and informative. I can't wait to read lots of your posts. pension advice

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Contacting Centrelink

Various news outlets reported on the 11/1/17 that the human services minister, Alan Tudge, said “…I know that the call wait time for Centrelink can be long, the average call wait time at present is about 12 minutes…” and “People can also go to a Centrelink office and typically they’ll be able to see a person, in person, within 10 minutes.” Now this is a significantly different to that reported by Centrelink staff and that which has been presented at Senate enquiries. The Australian National Audit Office reported that in 2013-14 13.7 million callers hung up after waiting for as much as 1 hour. From all reports the current situation is now far worse; especially since the average age pension claim processing times have gone from an average 6 weeks to 4-5 months! Now let’s test those ‘access’ times. It’s unlikely to be statistically significant, but it may give an idea of how a ‘typical’ Centerlink recipient needs to handle the situation. We are going to work with an age pensione
After the robo-debt debacle, here's how Centrelink can win back Australians' trust This article was originally published on  The Conversation . Read the  original article .                   Australia’s social security policy and service delivery system is not designed to put customer needs first.         AAP/Julian Smith         Paul Henman , The University of Queensland   The ongoing furore over Centrelink’s automated debt recovery program has highlighted a perfect storm of poor and worsening service delivery in the federal government’s premier service delivery agency.   The extent of Centrelink’s customer service delivery problems is legendary, and it has been getting worse over the last decade. There are several reasons for this, including policy changes and funding cuts. But while the situation may look dire, there are ways Centrelink can win over dissatisfied Australians. Worsening wait times and customer experiences Since its creation in 1997, Cent

Is $0.5m in super really a “small amount”?

When providing advice to a Centrelink age pensioner, a recent article in the mainstream press (7/9/16) suggested “for a relatively small amount, such as $500,000”.  Of course “relative” can mean a number of things and is dependent upon - relative to what. So let’s look at that relativity. First we look at what $500k in super means to a single age pensioner – as was the case for the press article. Let’s assume that this was the total amount of assets held by the age pensioner. The age pension would be reduced from $870 to approx. $440pf for that “relatively” small amount. In 2017 that age pension is expected to be reduced by a further $7,700 pa. A weekly loss to the age pensioners 'budget' of nearly $150 per week from the current 2016 pension. Back to judging whether that $500k is a relatively small amount. In December 2015 the Association of Superannuation Funds of Australia Ltd(ASFA) published the report “Superannuation Account Balances by Ag